<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do stories really matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brendanwatson.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brendanwatson.net/blog/?p=115</link>
	<description>Multimedia journalist, mass communication scholar, student and ecologist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:17:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Watson</title>
		<link>http://brendanwatson.net/blog/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanwatson.net/blog/?p=115#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Matt, I agree. I don&#039;t believe journalists should provide raw data (or at least only raw data), but rather should construct a narrative around it. Your right that narratives aren&#039;t just for show but play a potentially important role in cognition. What I am responding to is a traditional conception of narratives. I use the word story to refer to the traditional one-off narrative that  is most frequent in journalism. I think we should conceptualize these one off stories as potential data points in our overall narratives of the type you describe. And I couldn&#039;t agree more that these narratives can be structured in many different ways. I am currently studying relevance theory and how it suggests we might structure future journalism narratives. There&#039;s some rich stuff there.

But anyway, to agree with you in different language: tell more narratives! (Fewer stories).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I agree. I don&#8217;t believe journalists should provide raw data (or at least only raw data), but rather should construct a narrative around it. Your right that narratives aren&#8217;t just for show but play a potentially important role in cognition. What I am responding to is a traditional conception of narratives. I use the word story to refer to the traditional one-off narrative that  is most frequent in journalism. I think we should conceptualize these one off stories as potential data points in our overall narratives of the type you describe. And I couldn&#8217;t agree more that these narratives can be structured in many different ways. I am currently studying relevance theory and how it suggests we might structure future journalism narratives. There&#8217;s some rich stuff there.</p>
<p>But anyway, to agree with you in different language: tell more narratives! (Fewer stories).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://brendanwatson.net/blog/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brendanwatson.net/blog/?p=115#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Brendan, I&#039;m &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsless.org/2008/11/best-election-coverage-evar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;right there with you&lt;/a&gt; on most of this. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsless.org/2008/09/it-all-bubbles-up/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;And a half&lt;/a&gt;. 

But my takeaway isn&#039;t that stories aren&#039;t important, but that larger stories are *more* important. What I&#039;ve been whining about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsless.org/2008/09/journalists-bail-yourselves-out/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;with the financial crisis&lt;/a&gt;, for example, is our focus on reporting the latest developments, or on reporting the details of some specific aspect of the crisis, without anyone trying to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themoneymeltdown.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;draw out a larger narrative&lt;/a&gt; from the whole thing.

I think storytelling, be it visual, texual, or otherwise, is actually a useful technique for battling information overload. A narrative structure is one of the most intuitive methods of organization. So my takeaway is, don&#039;t just tell &lt;strong&gt;more&lt;/strong&gt; stories. Tell &lt;strong&gt;larger&lt;/a&gt; stories. Aggregate, curate, filter, select, edit, shape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendan, I&#8217;m <a href="http://www.newsless.org/2008/11/best-election-coverage-evar/" rel="nofollow">right there with you</a> on most of this. <a href="http://www.newsless.org/2008/09/it-all-bubbles-up/" rel="nofollow">And a half</a>. </p>
<p>But my takeaway isn&#8217;t that stories aren&#8217;t important, but that larger stories are *more* important. What I&#8217;ve been whining about <a href="http://www.newsless.org/2008/09/journalists-bail-yourselves-out/" rel="nofollow">with the financial crisis</a>, for example, is our focus on reporting the latest developments, or on reporting the details of some specific aspect of the crisis, without anyone trying to <a href="http://www.themoneymeltdown.com" rel="nofollow">draw out a larger narrative</a> from the whole thing.</p>
<p>I think storytelling, be it visual, texual, or otherwise, is actually a useful technique for battling information overload. A narrative structure is one of the most intuitive methods of organization. So my takeaway is, don&#8217;t just tell <strong>more</strong> stories. Tell <strong>larger stories. Aggregate, curate, filter, select, edit, shape.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
